[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: the comparison of the 1952 Republican platform with the DSA's
- To: Noelle <noelle>
- Subject: Re: the comparison of the 1952 Republican platform with the DSA's
- From: Robert <http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert>
- Date: Sat, 01 Aug 2026 08:08:22 -0700
- Keywords: our-Oakland-cell-phone-number
Nevertheless, with the latest DSA platform, I expect that its membership
will narrow further to the mostly white and the mostly young.
> From: Noelle <noelle>
> Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2026 10:38:09 -0700 (PDT)
>
> speaking of DSA from electoral-vote.com:
>
> D.A. in Brooklyn, NY, writes: In "Who Are the DSA Members?," your
> discussion of Nate Silver's analysis of the Democratic Socialists of
> America (DSA), you wrote:
>
> A study by the DSA of its membership showed that most of its
> members were working as teachers, nonprofit workers, social workers
> or government employees. They were not working class at all, and 85%
> were white, which is not even representative of the Democratic
> Party, let alone the country.
>
> You are confusing "working class" with "industrial working class."
> This is a mistake for three reasons. First, as a matter of
> definition, "working class" means people who: (1) work for
> wages/salary, (2) do not own the means of production, (3) have no or
> little say about the conditions and terms of their employment and
> (4) typically have little in the way of job security. The latter is
> becoming especially true for a wide range of occupations (university
> and other teachers; doctors, nurses and other health care workers;
> etc.). This process is called "proletarianiztion" and it has been
> going on since the birth of capitalism.
>
> Second, the U.S. has very much become a service economy: teachers,
> most nonprofit workers, social workers, and government employees and
> other white- and pink-collar workers are a large part of this
> economy.
>
> Third, if you look at the areas where the union movement is growing
> , you will see both independent unions (organizing Amazon warehouse
> workers and Starbucks baristas) as well as traditional "industrial"
> unions (like the UAW) organizing... graduate student TAs.
>
> While it is true that the industrial working class (factory workers,
> longshoremen, truck drivers, railroad workers) remain a strategic
> key to a successful revolutionary struggle against the ruling
> capitalist class, it constitutes a minority in the population and is
> less crucial in the kind of politics that Electoral-Vote.com covers
> (bourgeois democratic electoral politics).